JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)August 25, 1999

A- de 1999

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Fabio Morón Díaz

✓Claimant Mario Herrera Ladeutt

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencias.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se declaró que el Tribunal de la referencia es competente para avocar el conocimiento de la tutela instaurada por el accionante, en vista de que no se está frente a un desacato de una providencia de tutela, sino frente a nuevos hechos generadores de una acción de amparo, la cual debió ser conocida a prevención por parte del mencionado Tribunal; en consecuencia esta Corte ordenó devolver el expediente para que se surta el trámite correspondiente; según lo estipula el Art. 37 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. DECLARAR que el Tribunal Superior de Cartagena es competente para avocar el conocimiento de la accion de tutela instaurada por el ciudadano Mario Herrera Ladeutt.
  2. Segundo. ORDENAR el envio del expediente al Tribunal Superior de Cartagena para que se surta el tramite correspondiente.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.